Search for: All records

Abstract Tropical elevation gradients support highly diverse assemblages, but competing hypotheses suggest either peak species richness in lowland rainforests or at mid‐elevations. We investigated scolytine beetles—phloem, ambrosia and seed‐feeding beetles—along a tropical elevational gradient in Papua New Guinea.Highly standardised sampling from 200 to 3700 m above sea level (asl) identified areas of highest and lowest species richness, abundance and other biodiversity variables.Using passive flight intercept traps at eight elevations from 200 to 3500 m asl, we collected over 9600 specimens representing 215 species. Despite extensive sampling, species accumulation curves suggest that diversity was not fully exhausted.Scolytine species richness followed a unimodal distribution, peaking between 700 and 1200 m asl, supporting prior findings of highest diversity at low‐to‐mid elevations.Alternative models, such as a monotonous decrease from lowlands to higher elevations and a mid‐elevation maximum, showed lesser fit to our data. Abundance is greatest at the lowest sites, driven by a few extremely abundant species. The turnover rate—beta diversity between elevation steps—is greatest between the highest elevations.Among dominant tribes—Dryocoetini, Xyleborini and Cryphalini—species richness peaked between 700 and 2200 m asl. Taxon‐specific analyses revealed distinct patterns:Euwallaceaspp. abundance uniformly declined with elevation, while other genera were driven by dominant species at different elevations.Coccotrypesand phloem‐feedingCryphalushave undergone evolutionary radiations in New Guinea, with many species still undescribed. Species not yet known to science are most likely to be found at lower and middle elevations, where overall diversity is highest. 

The arboreal ecosystem is vitally important to global and local biogeochemical processes, the maintenance of biodiversity in natural systems, and human health in urban environments. The ability to collect samples, observations, and data to conduct meaningful scientific research is similarly vital. The primary methods and modes of access remain limited and difficult. In an online survey, canopy researchers ( n = 219) reported a range of challenges in obtaining adequate samples, including ∼10% who found it impossible to procure what they needed. Currently, these samples are collected using a combination of four primary methods: (1) sampling from the ground; (2) tree climbing; (3) constructing fixed infrastructure; and (4) using mobile aerial platforms, primarily rotorcraft drones. An important distinction between instantaneous and continuous sampling was identified, allowing more targeted engineering and development strategies. The combination of methods for sampling the arboreal ecosystem provides a range of possibilities and opportunities, particularly in the context of the rapid development of robotics and other engineering advances. In this study, we aim to identify the strategies that would provide the benefits to a broad range of scientists, arborists, and professional climbers and facilitate basic discovery and applied management. Priorities for advancing these efforts are (1) to expand participation, both geographically and professionally; (2) to define 2–3 common needs across the community; (3) to form and motivate focal teams of biologists, tree professionals, and engineers in the development of solutions to these needs; and (4) to establish multidisciplinary communication platforms to share information about innovations and opportunities for studying arboreal ecosystems.